Forbes, dated November 14, 2005 with Daniel Lyons’ Attack of the Blogs! screed.
Image by Niall Kennedy via Laughing Squid.
Those of you who hit Techmeme regularly know that the New York Times has outed “Fake Steve Jobs” of the popular blog The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs as Daniel Lyons of Forbes. Most of the conversation has been centred around things such as whether or not the blog will still be as good a read now that we know the man behind the pseudonym and now that it’ll be published by Forbes, what the real Steve Jobs thought, how the clues were there (in hindsight) and on Lyon’s upcoming book based on the blog: Options: The Secret Life of Steve Jobs, a Parody.
Precious few bytes have been devoted to a more interesting story: that Daniel Lyons is the author behind the inflammatory and calumnious Forbes cover story dated November 14, 2005: Attack of the Blogs. Valleywag mentions it in passing, but as far as I can tell from my scan of Techmeme stories, only Anil Dash has devoted any significant attention to it.
In case you forgot, the article opens with this gem:
Web logs are the prized platform of an online lynch mob spouting liberty but spewing lies, libel and invective. Their potent allies in this pursuit include Google and Yahoo.
…and goes on:
Some companies now use blogs as a weapon, unleashing swarms of critics on their rivals. “I’d say 50% to 60% of attacks are sponsored by competitors,” says Bruce Fischman, a lawyer in Miami for targets of online abuse.
To borrow a line I once used at a Tucows meeting: “Those numbers smell like the ass they were pulled from.”
Lyons also suggests these tactics in a “How to Fight Back” sidebar:
BASH BACK. If you get attacked, dig up dirt on your assailant and feed it to sympathetic bloggers. Discredit him.
ATTACK THE HOST. Find some copyrighted text that a blogger has lifted from your Web site and threaten to sue his Internet service provider under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. That may prompt the ISP to shut him down.
In other words, use every trick in the “screw the customer” book. Hell, that “attack the host” tip is straight from the Church of Scientology’s bag of dirty tricks.
By celebrating Dan Lyons/Fake Steve Jobs, who a mere two years ago pulled the biggest smear job on blogging and online discussion ever (as well as a strike against customers’ rights), you’re rewarding hypocrisy, slander profiteering and yellow journalism, some of the very things for which blogging, word of mouth and social networking were supposed to be an antidote. You’re lining the pockets of the man and publication that only two years ago were working against you.
Recommended Reading
- HOWTO punish bloggers, a tutorial for businesses from Forbes [BoingBoing]
- Attack of the Printing Press! The EFF’s Kurt Opsahl takes Lyons’ piece and chnages a few details, turning it into an attack by British Loyalists on the American revolutionaries and their treasonous technology, the printing press.
- Counter-Attack of the Blogs: A balanced and detailed analysis of Lyons’ piece and the blogosphere’s reaction.
- Forbes “Attack of the Blogs” is surprisingly accurate: One of the few blog entries out there to say “Lyons may be right”. I prefer to say that he’s mostly wrong.
- An Open Letter to Forbes Magazine Shel “Naked Conversations” Israel writes “I was embarrassed for both you and Forbes today, when I read your one-sided, fact-bashing diatribe. I would have expected this level of journalism to have come from other sources such as the New York Post or the online Guardian.”
- Glenn “Instapundit” Reynolds said: “FORBES attacks bloggers with an angry, adjective-filled article by Daniel Lyons that seems to live up to the worst claims it makes about the blogosphere — even to the extent of shilling for companies that purport to offer “brand protection” against blog attacks.”
- Om Malik: “The story makes some good points about the accuracy of blog posts, but they were lost in the fear-and-loathing approach taken by the magazine. I just found that the whole story was over-simplifed and had a one-sided take.”
- Forbes Cover Story Blows It, Calling Bloggers Lynch Mobs: Steve Rubel says “My message to Corporate America is simple. Don’t listen to Forbes. Take a look around the blogosphere for yourself and you will find real humans – good, bad and ugly.”
- The Blogosmear: Doc Searls says “The problem I have with Lyons’ piece is bad synecdoche, the latter word meaning a part representing the whole.”
7 replies on “Fake Steve Jobs is a Dick”
While the real Steve Jobs must be relieved, the competition in Redmond can be added to the list of the upset. The usually reticent Bill Gates already had some not-so-namaste things to say about the whole Daniel Lyons affair.
Others have written on it, but we’re filtered by Techmeme, so we get ignored.
Not only is Dan a hypocrite, he basically *stole* all the things that made FSJ popular in the first place! His usage of “Tard” in compound words was *stolen*. His “pet names” for industry big wigs? Stolen. He wrote a piece about the Yahoo SCOX message board called Revenge of the Nerds a few years ago. That is where Lyons *ripped off* everything that made an otherwise humourless moron into audacious industry darling FSJ!
[…] the identity of the blogger known as Fake Steve Jobs, I am compelled to infomr you of something: Fake Steve Jobs is a Dick. See WordPress | […]
[…] In the article, Gruber does a good job of reminding us of where Dan Lyons is coming from – remember, he writes for Newsweek, which is a pretty sad substitute for Time, where the preferred style of reportage was described to me by a friend of mine who wrote for them as “sustained obviousness”. Yes, it’s all ad hominem-y. but it’s entertaining and filled with lots of truth. Besides, I’ve made my feelings clear about Mr. “Fake Steve Jobs” in my article titled Fake Steve Jobs is a Dick. […]
Lighten up; whatever you think about Dan Lyons’ other work, FSJ is consistently funny and irreverant. Joey, I’ve enjoyed reading your blog for a while now and thought you would be above this kind of infighting.
excowboy: I promise that I’ll be above this sort of hoo-hah most of the time. I think I can lapse into a little infighting now and again, can’t I? AFter all, people who neglect their vices completely tend to die early.