Categories
Uncategorized

RFID Lowdown's 51 Uses for the Mark of the Beast

RFID chip

Over at RFID Lowdown, they've got a list of 51 “cool, surprising and scary” futuristic uses for RFID tags, and hey, not all of them are privacy-threatening. Here are a few:

  • Tracking cars for location data and traffic reports and to prevent theft
  • Following things through manufacturing/processing, whether it's food or products
  • Following things through the supply chain, as it changes from a tree into Kleenex
  • Navigation aids for the handicapped
  • Replacements for the postage stamp
  • Tagging items to prevent theft/shoplifting; tagging Alzheimer's patients who are prone to wandering
  • As “dongles” to prevent unauthorized access to computers
  • Tagging patients so that doctors don't perform the wrong procedures on them; tagging medicine so that you get reminders to take them or not to take the wrong ones
  • Shopping: Having your shopping cart say “people who bought what you boguht also bought…”, dynamic pricing, self-scanning checkout
  • Dealing with clutter or large collections of items
  • Telling if the soccer ball really did cross the goal line
  • RFID-tagged clothes so that your smart closet will tell you not to wear that shirt with those pants
  • Sorting garbage and recyclables: so your smart bin can tell you which goes where

Link

Categories
Uncategorized

And Now, Your Moment of Zen…

Why should The Daily Show have all the fun?

Ballmer

Categories
Uncategorized

Gift idea: from the cheap geek

DealMac points out this ridiculously cheap limited offer for the iPod owner in your life:

Once again, HandHeldItems.com offers its iPod Crystal Clear Film Shield Protector for either the 1st-generation iPod nano or iPod "video" for $4.99. Coupon code "diofilm" trims it to one cent. That's $4.98 off and easily the lowest price we've seen. Shipping adds $2.85. Limit one discounted protector per order. Deal ends December 15.

The catch? These clear protectors wear out after a few months of use (they peel up at the edges) and have to be replaced, and probably not at the price of one penny. But, hey, you wouldn't care about that—you're the kind of geek with the balls to give someone a $.01 present.

Tags: , , ,

Categories
Uncategorized

Expert perspectives on personalization

Kind of a follow-up on our recent posts on recommendation engine post: Greg "Findory" Linden has a quick post about a talk he gave at Stanford on personalized recommendations.

The slides from my talk are available in two versions. The first version is the talk I actually gave; make sure to read the notes pages for the slides, or it will be difficult to follow. The second version is done in a very different style and should be easier to follow without me blabbing away in front of you.

Personally, I recommend the slides with the notes. A really interesting talk; I wish I had been there.

Link

Tags: , ,

Categories
Uncategorized

Photoshop, the data cleansing tool

From a Paul "Infectious Greed" Kedrosky post on Photoshop techniques:

Taking it up a level, what is happening here is that tourists are just another kind of outlier digital data in a digital database, otherwise known as a photo. Like cleaning spurious data from traditional data sets, which has gone on forever, related ad hoc techniques are now appearing in the consumer imaging world. Fascinating.

Tourists are spurious data! I love that conceit. Since I walk home through the throngs of out of towners gwaking at the show windows of Fifth Avenue, I only wish that it were so in real life.

Link

Categories
Uncategorized

Google and BSkyB (or ad networks, distribution, and advertisers)

The news that "Don't-Be-Evil" Google has struck a deal with yet another deal with a unit of News "Evil-Is-Our-Middle-Name" Corporation is the talk of the blogosphere today. This Financial Times article describing Google's tie up with UK entertainment company British Sky Broadcasting (BSkyB) is as good an overview as any.

While Sky's press release would like you to know that this deal is variously, leading, ground-breaking, wide-ranging, compelling, customized, and innovative (and that's within the first graf). I just want to know why it's important (and speculate on why these two companies got together). Let's start with Sky.

Sky's a UK-based, vertically-integrated media company—Time Warner with an accent. They create content, they aggregate content in the form of channels like Sky One (which are distributed by third party cable operators like NTL, too), and they distribute that content (and content aggregated by others, of course) to their customers via digital platforms. The primary platform would be digital pay TV, but an increasingly important secondary platform is broadband. Sky has been aggressive about providing  their customers the ability to view the media they've paid for on more than one device, or at a time that suits them (within limits, of course—you can download some of the TV shows and movies that play on Sky channels to your PC, but it'll be crippled with Windows Media DRM, so, sorry Mac, iPod, and Linux users…). Increased broadband presence also means Sky's going to provide ever-more services to their customer: entertainment, communicatons, commerce. The goal is for Sky to mediate their customers' every interaction with the worlds of entertainment and commerce whenever they're at home, by a phone, or on their computer.

Google, of course, is building a comprehensive digital advertising network. The goal for them is to be a one-stop shop for advertisers as they attempt to reach the broadest audience possible with the most precisely-targeted set of messages possible. Google won't stop until they can promise an advertiser that they can send the right message to the appropriate customer through every advertising vehicle possible: internet (search, banner, rich media), broadcast and cable television, radio, print. Hell, I bet they have a plan for outdoor and indoor display.

The quick wins in this partnership are all on the broadband and web side: Sky Broadband is going to deliver what looks like a white label Google Apps for Your Domain (start page, mail, chat, calendar, and web pages) to their customers. Good for Sky Broadband, since this means they're effectively outsourcing the management and operation of those services to someone with far greater skills and expertise (and lower costs per user). Good for Google, as they add a potential million users to their services. That's a million more unique visitors generating pageviews and dropping behavioral data for Google-delivered targeted advertising.

Sky will also power their web properties' (including Mykindaplace.com, SkyOne.co.uk, Monkeyslum.com, and Livingit.com, among others) search via Google and run Google AdWords ads on their results pages. Sky gets some way of making money from the search function, and Google gets more inventory to sell to their advertisers.

More intriguing is the idea of licensing the YouTube platform to create (what sounds like) a Sky-branded YouTube "competitor." I suppose Sky figures there's a need in the world for another YouTube that's exactly like YouTube, only larded with Sky content, and I can't see the harm to Google if, in the end, they can target whatever advertising they send to YouTube.com just as easily to "SkyTube."

The companies have the option of extending the scope of these agreements (for example, offering some kind of customized Google Talk VoIP services to Sky Broadband customers, or expanding the advertising agreement to include AdSense ads on non-search pages on Sky web properties).

The FT article, presumably based on information from Sky and Google insiders, connects the most interesting dots in this deal:

The companies plan to extend the partnership to BSkyB’s core television platform, however, by replacing traditional 30-second television adverts with targeted commercials stored on hard drives in BSkyB’s set-top boxes.

Google’s AdSense technology, which brings up adverts relevant to search terms of users, would be deployed alongside BSkyB’s knowledge of its customers’ profiles and interests.

And all the pieces come together.

If BSkyB is trying to assemble a multi-platform interface between the customer, media, and commerce, then making money requires an advertsing platform that dovetails with that strategy through breadth of channels and intelligence of targeting. If you're aggressively building that ad platform, you need to partner with a media company aggressively pulling all the pieces together (along with a decent underlying build-out of broadband infrastructure to the customer).

That's the logic behind this deal. It makes money (and sense) for both parties from the get-go, but the medium term implications are even bigger.

Tags: , , , , ,

Categories
Uncategorized

News Flash: Hollywood Depictions of Hacking and Cracking are Not Accurate!

Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum from 'Independence Day': WE R IN UR SHIP, CRASHING UR SRVR.

Drivl.com has a funny list titled What code DOESN'T do in real life (that it does in the movies). I can see some coders taking issue with number 9: that coders use mice — I know some programmers who very actively eschew that UI device.