Global Nerdy

5 Ways To Know When It’s Time To Find Another Job is an InformationWeek article based on the advice of experts from Challenger Gray & Christmas and Monster.com that lists five signs that it may be time to dust off the ol’ resume and start looking around.

The article explains the reluctance of high-tech workers to leave their current jobs, even though such reluctance may be unwarranted:

After the dot-com bubble burst several years ago, a lot of high-tech workers simply felt lucky to have a job–any job. Gone were the days when chief security officers, Java developers, and project managers could pick up a new, and better, job as easily as picking up a latte. Human Resources managers stopped worrying about how to keep good employees from leaving for better jobs. People who had decent jobs counted themselves lucky, kept their heads down and just hoped they weren’t next to be outsourced or otherwise pink slipped.

Those days are gone. High-tech jobs are being created. There are new positions to move into. A lot of people, though, aren’t picking up stakes and moving on. They’re stuck in that head-down mentality and maybe they’re missing the opportunity to find that great next job.

Here are the five signs…

1. If you’re not learning anything anymore. “If you’re no longer learning, the indication is that your time there is over. If you have a really good boss, it can be hard to leave that. But if you’ve learned everything you can from that company and that great boss, you’re not helping yourself by staying.”
2. If the rumor mill says things are going to get worse, especially if your company’s just been merged or acquired. “It’s rare that rumors stay alive when there’s nothing behind them. Pay attention to the rumor mill when it’s about acquisitions, mergers and layoffs. Mergers and acquisitions are a real red flag that some of you will go, if not all of you. There’s a lot of rumors but when everybody is talking about layoffs and it’s being said and said and management isn’t coming out and denying it, then that’s not good Your job is in the most jeopardy if your company has just been acquired.”
3. If you have a toxic co-worker (or worse, more than one). “Is there a bully roaming your office? Is someone else always taking credit for your work? What about that jerk who takes obvious glee in getting under your skin or that one person who makes you dread walking through the office door every morning? Answering yes to any of these questions probably means you’re working in a toxic environment.”
4. If you and the boss have irreconcilable differences. “Are you not receiving challenging work? Are you not getting plum assignments? Is there room for advancement or do you feel like your advancement is being blocked? Are you not being recognized sufficiently, either monetarily or within the organization, for your efforts? Everybody feels all those issues at one time or another. It’s about your level of concern and do you have more than one of these issues?”
5. If you are underpaid and overworked. “Are you not earning what you think others of equal stature are either at this company or at competitors? Are you not getting raises or bonuses? If so, it’s time to do some homework.”

Link

Employee dissatisfaction is at an all-time high, according to a national survey released Monday by the Conference Board, a New York-based private research group.In a survey of 5,000 U.S. households, more than half of all respondents said they dislike their current jobs, compared to less than 40 percent in a similar survey conducted 20 years ago.

These days, the lowest levels of job satisfaction are among younger workers, the survey found. Only 39 percent of respondents aged 25 and younger said they liked their current jobs — the lowest level in the survey’s 20-year history — compared to 45 percent for workers between 45 and 54.

By contrast, job-satisfaction levels are highest among older workers, with nearly half of all respondents between 55 and 64, and 65 and over, feeling satisfied by their employment situation.

Job-satisfaction levels tend to rise as the hours worked per week increase, survey results indicated, but at 60 or more hours, satisfaction levels drop again. Additionally, respondents who expect to remain in their current position a year from now reported higher satisfaction levels than those who see themselves working elsewhere.

Link

[via Reddit]

Jeff “Coding Horror” Atwood writes about why he’s not getting full use of the 4 gigs of RAM he put into his computer. He’s got a 32-bit system, which means that the largest amount of space that it can address without resorting to jiggery-pokery is 2³² bytes, which is 4 gigabytes, which is 4,096 megabytes or 4,294,967,296 bytes. Any address outside the zone bounded by 0 and 4,294,967,296 is “out of its field of vision”.

After installing extra RAM in his machine for a grand total of 4 gigs (which according to this article is the “sweet spot” for Vista), Jeff wondered why the System Information window on his machine said that there was only 3,454 megs of RAM on his machine. “Where, exactly,” asks Jeff, “did the other 642 megabytes of my memory go?”

It turns out that it went to memory-mapped I/O. CPUs access things in the system via their addresses. Most of a computer’s address space is devoted to RAM, some to ROM, and the rest is pretty much for I/O. In order to have I/O (without which your computer would be largely useless to you), you’ve got to sacrifice some address space that would otherwise go to RAM. Jeff explains it in detail quite well and ends with these two points:

1. ” Although the performance benefits of 64-bit are somewhat dubious on the desktop, a 64-bit OS is absolutely essential if you run applications that need to use more than 2 GB of memory. It’s not common, but we’re getting there.”
2. “Here’s one final bit of advice: if, like me, you’re planning to stick with a 32-bit operating system for the next few years, don’t waste your money on 4 GB of RAM. You won’t be able to use it all. Buy 3 GB instead. Every motherboard I’m aware of will happily accept 2 x 1 GB and 2 x 512 MB DIMMs.”

I myself have been spared the 4 gig limitation. The Taint (my name for the Acer Ferrari laptop sent to me by Microsoft in their controversial campaign to promote Vista in the blogosphere) has a 64-bit AMD CPU and runs the x64 version of Windows Vista Ultimate. From a RAM expansion point of view, I’m set for a while.

Now when considering the availability of drivers, that’s another story…

Link

We’ve pointed to two Consumerist articles: A Former Verizon Sales Rep’s 8 Tips for Buying a Verizon Phone and 7 Confessions of a Former Cingular Sales Rep, in which recovering salespeople for Verizon and Cingular provide tips on how to get the best deal from their former employers.

Now a T-Mobile sales rep has come forward and revealed to Consumerist a list of 11 tips for getting the best deal from T-Mobile:

1. T-Mobile will match prices from competitors. “…they can honor any price that has been printed (advertisement), as long as the terms and conditions are the same as T-Mobile’s.”
2. T-Mobile lets reps give away accessories. “Most reps have the ability to give away accessories for free without checking with their managers. If we give any bit of discount, we don’t get paid out on the accessory so you might as well ask for it for free.”
3. Use features to get free stuff, avoid insurance. “As other reps have stated, features are a big portion for reps. Any data feature nets the rep some extra cash…The only thing that does not earn us money is insurance, so stay away from that one.”
4. Shop at the end of the month. “T-mobile has a quota system for reps. They’ll be more generous at the end of the month.”
5. Never get a 2 year contract. “As the VZW rep said, only sign a one year contract. Yeah you have to pay 50 bucks more, but you can upgrade again in 11 months.”
6. Your rate plan doesn’t mean anything at T-Mobile. “At T-mobile, we don’t get paid very much on how high the rate plan is, so don’t push that you are going to spend a lot on the plan. We care about the accessories and the features.”
7. Get your rebate at the store and on-line. “As the cingy guy said, if you ask and get an in-store instant rebate, you can still find the mail in rebate at www.tmobilerebates.com. The rebate center will still honor it.”
8. Get free stuff by calling within 14 days and threatening to switch to another carrier. “If you want to squeeze a bit more out of the deal and you are within 14 days of new service, call the store and ask to speak to the rep that helped you. Remind him/her who you are, and ask what you need to do to cancel. This will set off alarms in the reps head since you are their customer, and they will get a chargeback if you cancel.”
9. Replace a broken T-mobile phone with a prepaid one.“Go to Walmart and buy a T-Mobile prepaid phone. Your contract sim card will work in the phone no problem, and there is NO difference (software or hardware wise) between a prepaid phone and one that is upgraded with contract. Then put the prepaid activation code and sim card up on ebay, and make $10. (from what I hear, this is the same with Cingular and Verizon).”
10. Upgrade over the phone, not in a store. “At T-Mobile, reps don’t get paid much for upgrades and don’t care if you get a deal on a phone. Upgrade over the phone to get the best deal.”
11. Unlock your phone. Immediately call into customer care and ask to have your phone unlocked. Unlocking your phone allows your phone to be used with any GSM carrier (Cingular is the only other national US carrier). T-mobile will unlock your phone for free at anytime during or after you contract. Once you unlock your phone, you can now use a cingular sim card or any sim card in the world. Whether or not you plan on traveling, you have still increased the resell value of your phone by quite a bit.

I’m still waiting for someone from Bell Mobility to spill the beans on how to get the best deal from them…

The article Developers aim to lure women to adult games starts off like any other article about attracting women to videogames, with the usual talk of the problems inherent in games designed for a specific demographic, namely the white straight techo-savvy male.

The first sign that it’s not like most articles about the gender imbalance in gaming is the admission of a truth that anyone who’s ever worked at a bar (George and I did in college) knows: if you want to lure the men, you’ve got to lure the women.

Then, after the halfway point, the article — either intentionally or not — just gets sillier. First, there’s the explanation by the creators of the Jenna Jameson [link safe for work] game Virtually Jenna [link not safe for work] of how they made their game more appealing to women by emphasizing the story aspects of the game:

We’re evolving [the] story like Penthouse Forum, and you finish it off, so it gets more cerebral.

Having read heard about some Penthouse Forum letters myself, I cannot recall any cerebral aspects.

When presented with the question of why gay men are underserved by adult games, out come the weasel words:

Several participants in the discussion said that gay men and women are also underserved. And one main reason, it was agreed, is that because straight couples have different body movements when having sex than do gay men or women, there’s often too much animation work required to satisfy those markets.

“Everything we want people to be able to do has to be animated separately,” Dudley said. The way that men interact with men differs from how men interact with women. So if we’re going to deal with gay sex, which we do, then the amount of work we have to do” skyrockets.

Working in an area of Toronto that is known for the number of offices for adult web sites and knowing some of their employees, I’ve heard graphic artists and animators boast of the long hours they spend toiling over their beloved craft. I think that they’re just making excuses — these guys, faced with the prospect of long sessions of animating hot man-on-man action, are simply looking for a (ahem) back door. Surely they can find some gay animators who’d love doing that work as much as their straight counterparts enjoy working on the Jenna kinematics.

After all, they boasted about a certain feature in the straight-male-oriented Virtually Jenna that sounded it required a lot of extra work:

Abram said that Virtually Jenna allows players to highly customize their characters, including giving those wanting men with different size genitalia the ability to get what they want.

The same goes for what Abram called “ass physics,” essentially the firmness of the male buttocks.

“I guarantee you, ‘ass physics’ has never been said at GDC before,” Brathwaite said.

I can guarantee that it’s never been said at Global Nerdy until just now.

A cute image, courtesy of Reddit:

I have a confession to make: in spite of the fact that I work for an internet services company and get paid to wirte on internet-related topics all the time, I haven’t fully worked out my position on network neutrality.

Don’t get me wrong: I tend towards the pro-neutrality side. It’s just that my leaning is based not on serious study of the issue, but on a general gut feeling. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. I’d be willing to bet that most of you can look back on your life experiences and say that the times you wished you’d gone with your gut outnumber the times you’ve asked yourself “Why did I trust my stupid instincts?”.

What I haven’t done is work out some reasoning to either back up or disprove that gut feeling. I’m devoting way more brain cells to revamping the Tucows web sites for which I am responsible, working out new applications for the company APIs, mastering Ruby and Ruby on Rails, and working on some ideas with George. Guys like Om and the Valleywaggers — they have the time and resources to look at the problem from all angles and perhaps work out a rationale. I wish I did.

What’s partly responsible for my gut feeling is my distrust of the people who are campaigning against network neutrality, and the latest volley of spin from Hands Off the Internet, as written up in the TechDirt article Hands Off the Truth only helps to justify it. One of the Mikes from TechDirt writes:

If we get something factually wrong, we’ll admit it and correct our mistakes. Apparently, Hands Off The Internet doesn’t feel the same way. They certainly don’t allow comments on their blog. I emailed them to point out their mistakes and to suggest they make a correction — but rather than do so, they put up a second post referring to our post, without bothering to correct their factually incorrect statements. While we might have some common ground with them — though our position isn’t as extreme as theirs — it really makes you wonder why they’re so disconnected from the truth. It doesn’t make anyone any more likely to support their side. It just makes us wonder how truthful even their seemingly legitimate points are. If they play so fast and loose with the facts on such obvious points, perhaps they can’t be trusted on anything else as well.

Link