Here’s number 11 in the Enumerating Enumerable series, in which I’m trying to outdo RubyDoc.org in their documentation of Ruby’s key Enumerable
module. In this article, I cover the each_with_index
method.
In case you missed the earlier articles, they’re listed and linked below:
Enumerable#each_with_index Quick Summary
In the simplest possible terms | Think of each_with_index as a version of each that includes an extra piece of information: a number representing the current iteration’s element’s position in the collection. |
---|---|
Ruby version | 1.8 and 1.9 |
Expects | An optional block to receive the values from each iteration. |
Returns |
|
RubyDoc.org’s entry | Enumerable#each_with_index |
Enumerable#each_with_index and Arrays
When used with on an array and given a block, each_with_index
iterates through the array, passing each item in the array and the number representing its order in the array to the block. Once again, I’ll use the “Justice League” example:
justice_league = ["Aquaman", "Batman", "Black Canary", \ "Flash", "Green Arrow", "Green Lantern", \ "Martian Manhunter", "Superman", \ "Vixen", "Wonder Woman"] justice_league = ["Aquaman", "Batman", "Black Canary", "Flash", "Green Arrow", "Green Lantern", "Martian Manhunter", "Superman", "Vixen", "Wonder Woman"] justice_league.each_with_index {|member, index| puts "#{index}: #{member}"} => 0: Aquaman 1: Batman 2: Black Canary 3: Flash 4: Green Arrow 5: Green Lantern 6: Martian Manhunter 7: Superman 8: Vixen 9: Wonder Woman => ["Aquaman", "Batman", "Black Canary", "Flash", "Green Arrow", "Green Lantern", "Martian Manhunter", "Superman", "Vixen", "Wonder Woman"]
Note that unlike the each_cons
and each_slice
, each_with_index
doesn’t return nil
, but the original array, just like each
does. each_cons
and each_slice
are newer methods that were introduced in Ruby 1.9; perhaps Matz and company decided that it made more sense for “each” methods to return nil
from now on. each
and each_with_index
have return the original array as they always have, since making changes to these methods might break a lot of existing Ruby code. Hooray for those little inconsistencies that creep into every programming language!
Enumerable#each_with_index and Hashes
When used with on a hash and given a block, each_with_index
iterates through the hash, converting each item in the hash into a two-element array (where the first element is the key and the second element is the corresponding value), and then passing that array and the number representing its order in the original array to the block. Once again, I’ll use the “Enterprise Crew” example:
enterprise_crew = {:captain => "Picard", :first_officer => "Riker", :science_officer => "Data", :tactical_officer => "Worf", :chief_engineer => "LaForge", :chief_medical_officer => "Crusher", :ships_counselor => "Troi", :annoying_ensign => "Crusher", :attractive_ensign => "Ro", :expendable_crew_member => "Smith"} => {:captain=>"Picard", :first_officer=>"Riker", :science_officer=>"Data", :tactical_officer=>"Worf", :chief_engineer=>"LaForge", :chief_medical_officer=>"Crusher", :ships_counselor=>"Troi", :annoying_ensign=>"Crusher", :attractive_ensign=>"Ro", :expendable_crew_member=>"Smith"} enterprise_crew.each_with_index {|member, index| puts "#{index}: #{member}"} => 0: [:captain, "Picard"] 1: [:first_officer, "Riker"] 2: [:science_officer, "Data"] 3: [:tactical_officer, "Worf"] 4: [:chief_engineer, "LaForge"] 5: [:chief_medical_officer, "Crusher"] 6: [:ships_counselor, "Troi"] 7: [:annoying_ensign, "Crusher"] 8: [:attractive_ensign, "Ro"] 9: [:expendable_crew_member, "Smith"] => {:captain=>"Picard", :first_officer=>"Riker", :science_officer=>"Data", :tactical_officer=>"Worf", :chief_engineer=>"LaForge", :chief_medical_officer=>"Crusher", :ships_counselor=>"Troi", :annoying_ensign=>"Crusher", :attractive_ensign=>"Ro", :expendable_crew_member=>"Smith"}
Enumerable#each_with_index Oddities
Blocks with a Single Parameter
What happens if you use each_with_index
with a block that has only one parameter? You’d think that the block would accept the item and index passed to it as a two-element array, with the item as the first element and the corresponding index as the second element, but that’s not the case:
# For each item in justice_league, this line will output the following: # {second letter of member's name} : {first letter of member's name} justice_league.each_with_index {|member| puts "#{member[1]}: #{member[0]}"} => q: A a: B l: B l: F r: G r: G a: M u: S i: V o: W => ["Aquaman", "Batman", "Black Canary", "Flash", "Green Arrow", "Green Lantern" , "Martian Manhunter", "Superman", "Vixen", "Wonder Woman"]
When each_with_index
passes an item and its index to a block that takes only one parameter, the item goes into the paramter, and the index is discarded. Simply put, in this case, each_with_index
behaves just like each
.
Without a Block
What happens if you use each_with_index
without a block to create an Enumerator
object that spits out the next item when its next
method is called? This:
hero = justice_league.each_with_index => #<Enumerable::Enumerator:0x159cb98> hero.next => "Aquaman" hero.next => "Batman" hero.next => "Black Canary"
Note that calling next
only yields the next item in the collection; the index information is lost. In this case, each_with_index
behaves just like each
.